Logoadcomply.pro
Sign In

Analyze by URL

Find out why your ads get rejected

Paste a URL to see hidden policy risks before you run ads

SAMPLE ANALYSIS

See what your analysis will look like

This is a sample result. Paste your landing page URL on the left and run a scan to replace it with your real report.

faviconadcomply.pro/examples/finance/passive-income-trading-system ↗
95/ 100

Policy risk score

↓ Among the worst-performing pages in this category

Trust and transparency issues still create likely reject risk.

23 issues · 6 critical · 3 trust signals detected

Financial Services·Meta Ads

Launch readout

likely reject

Likely Reject

This funnel is likely to be rejected or heavily restricted unless the current blockers are fixed first.

Do not launch yet. Resolve the blockers below and re-run the analysis before spending traffic.

Why this verdict

Primary blockers

These are the signals most likely to cause rejection or hard review friction on their own.

  • The page combines strong earnings claims with proof-style visuals, making profits look more dependable than they are. Example: "DAILY PROFIT: +$48,732.50 TOTAL BALANCE: $372,850.24".
  • The offer still frames financial gains as passive, easy, or achievable with little expertise. Example: “This system replaced my primary income stream.”.
  • Urgency still pushes users toward financial upside before they have enough time to evaluate the risk.

Secondary risks

These do not usually drive the verdict alone, but they make the funnel look less consistent or more misleading.

  • The entry path still changes after the click, from instant access claims to a qualification or approval flow.
  • Earnings claims are still presented with different certainty or conditions after the click.

Trust amplifiers

These increase scrutiny and make the main blockers harder to defend during review.

  • Users are prompted to act before the actual offer structure, qualification step, or account setup is clearly explained.
  • In financial offers, missing risk and licensing details make the funnel look less trustworthy to reviewers.

Best next actions

  • First: Remove proof-style balance or profit screenshots unless they are clearly labeled as non-typical and not used as a reason to act. Example: "DAILY PROFIT: +$48,732.50 TOTAL BALANCE: $372,850.24".
  • Then: Remove low-effort, passive-income, or no-experience framing around financial results. For example: “This system replaced my primary income stream.”.
  • Then: Remove urgency, scarcity, or limited-time framing when it is used to push profit, return, or income expectations. Such as: "Enrollment Closing Soon".

Pre-launch checklist

1/5

A quick read on whether this page is ready for paid traffic.

20% launch-ready · 4 items need work

No critical policy blockers

Needs work

A high-severity issue still needs to be fixed.

Business details are easy to verify

Needs work

Risk, sponsor, or licensing details still appear too late.

Offer is clear before the main action

Needs work

Users still have to act before the real offer is fully explained.

Pricing and commitment are clear enough

Pass

Pricing and protection terms look clear.

Ad and landing stay aligned

Needs work

Important trust details still appear only after the click.

Fix priority queue

3 items

Start with the fixes most likely to improve approval odds fastest.

3 high-impact fixes visible · cut risk by up to 24

1.Fix first

Remove proof-style balance or profit screenshots unless they are clearly labeled as non-typical and not used as a reason to act. Example: "DAILY PROFIT: +$48,732.50 TOTAL BALANCE: $372,850.24".

Focused on: Guaranteed Profit Claim

Estimated impact: -12 risk across 9 issues

2.High impact

Remove or rewrite instant-access or activation claims that conflict with the actual qualification or approval flow. Example: "Start with just $250 and activate y... vs Access is limited to qualified part...".

Focused on: Messaging mismatch

Estimated impact: -8 risk across 3 issues

3.High impact

Remove low-effort, passive-income, or no-experience framing around financial results. Example: "“This system replaced my primary income stream.”".

Focused on: Income Replacement Claim

Estimated impact: -4.5 risk across 6 issues

What drives this score

🔥 Guaranteed Profit Claim
+12
Income Replacement Claim
+9
Messaging mismatch
+8

Why this leads to ad rejection

  • • Illustrative investor results are still concrete enough to make trading performance feel more dependable than the surrounding disclosures support
  • • Screenshots and proof-style visuals are used to make large trading gains feel typical or established
  • • The ad and landing together imply that automated trading can generate reliable profits with minimal expertise
  • • The ad and landing page shift the required action or access step, which can make the commitment feel different after the click

Trust and transparency issues

3 signals

A compact view of the non-policy trust issues most likely to hurt approval odds.

10 compliance risks found

Income Replacement Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 4.5 risk score
high
Guaranteed Profit Claim

2 issues

Fixing this reduces 12 risk score
high
Daily Profit Claim

2 issues

Fixing this reduces 6 risk score
medium
Passive Income Claim

2 issues

Fixing this reduces 3 risk score
medium
No Experience Required Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 4 risk score
medium
Specific Earnings Claim

2 issues

Fixing this reduces 7 risk score
medium
Investment Return Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 4 risk score
medium
Urgency Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 2 risk score
medium
Scarcity Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 2 risk score
medium
Gated Access Claim

1 issue

Fixing this reduces 1.5 risk score
medium

Official policy reference

Source guidelines for this platform and category.

meta
Open official policy ↗

⚡ For more accurate analysis on dynamic pages, use the Chrome extension